A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing

A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing
Author :
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Total Pages : 289
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9781107175068
ISBN-13 : 1107175062
Rating : 4/5 (062 Downloads)

Book Synopsis A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing by : Francisco J. Urbina

Download or read book A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing written by Francisco J. Urbina and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2017 with total page 289 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This book offers a comprehensive critique of the principle of proportionality and balancing as applied to human and constitutional rights.


A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing Related Books

A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing
Language: en
Pages: 290
Authors: Francisco J. Urbina
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book offers a comprehensive critique of the principle of proportionality and balancing as applied to human and constitutional rights.
A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing
Language: en
Pages: 289
Authors: Francisco J. Urbina
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book offers a comprehensive critique of the principle of proportionality and balancing as applied to human and constitutional rights.
A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: Francisco Javier Urbina Molfino
Categories: Human rights
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"The principle of proportionality, which has become the standard test for adjudicating human and constitutional rights disputes in jurisdictions worldwide has h
Proportionality and Judicial Activism
Language: en
Pages: 261
Authors: Niels Petersen
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-03-02 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book uses empirical analysis to show that courts refrain from using the proportionality test as a means of judicial activism.